Head to head · checked 2026-10-13
Kameleo vs Octo Browser
Kameleo wins 4 of 8 criteria (fingerprint engine, local-first privacy, free tier, automation & api). Octo Browser leads on platforms, profile management.
Kameleo wins 4 of 8 criteria, Octo Browser wins 2.
Side by side
| Kameleo | Octo Browser | |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | Chroma (Chromium), Junglefox (Firefox) | Chromium (Chromium) |
| Free plan | 2 concurrent browsers, unlimited local profiles, 100 cloud profiles. | None. 2-day trial. |
| Paid from | €59/mo, 10 concurrent browsers, 5,000 cloud profiles | €10/mo, 3 profiles |
| Linux | Partial | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| Storage | Local + cloud | Cloud |
| Account | Required | Required |
| Automation | Local API, SDKs, Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium | API from Base (€79), Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright |
| Incidents | None found | None found |
Choose Kameleo if
Teams that run heavy automation and need two engines.
Choose Octo Browser if
Teams that pay for support and want cloud sync.
FAQ
Is Kameleo better than Octo Browser?
On our method, yes: 66.4 vs 51.6. Kameleo wins on fingerprint engine, local-first privacy, free tier, automation & api; Octo Browser wins on platforms, profile management.
Which is cheaper, Kameleo or Octo Browser?
Kameleo: 2 concurrent browsers, unlimited local profiles, 100 cloud profiles. Paid from €59/mo. Octo Browser: None. 2-day trial. Paid from €10/mo.
Do Kameleo and Octo Browser support Linux?
Kameleo: Partial. Octo Browser: Yes.
More: add Donut Browser · add Camoufox · add Multilogin · full ranking