Head to head · checked 2026-10-13
Donut Browser vs Camoufox
Donut Browser wins 3 of 8 criteria (fingerprint engine, automation & api, profile management). Camoufox leads on open source, price at scale.
Donut Browser wins 3 of 8 criteria, Camoufox wins 2.
Side by side
| Donut Browser | Camoufox | |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | Chromium fork (Chromium) | Camoufox (Firefox) |
| Free plan | Unlimited local profiles, full fingerprinting, proxies, WireGuard, local API. No account. | Fully free. No profile manager. |
| Paid from | $29/mo, 20 cloud backups, remote MCP, commercial use | Free |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | AGPL-3.0 (app) | MPL-2.0 |
| Storage | Local + cloud | Local |
| Account | Not required | Not required |
| Automation | Local REST API, CDP for Playwright, Puppeteer and Selenium, MCP | Playwright (Python and Node) |
| Incidents | None found | None found |
Choose Donut Browser if
Anyone who wants unlimited free profiles that never leave their machine.
Choose Camoufox if
Developers who script Playwright and need no GUI.
FAQ
Is Donut Browser better than Camoufox?
On our method, yes: 93 vs 84.8. Donut Browser wins on fingerprint engine, automation & api, profile management; Camoufox wins on open source, price at scale.
Which is cheaper, Donut Browser or Camoufox?
Donut Browser: Unlimited local profiles, full fingerprinting, proxies, WireGuard, local API. No account. Paid from $29/mo. Camoufox: Fully free. No profile manager. Paid from Free.
Do Donut Browser and Camoufox support Linux?
Donut Browser: Yes. Camoufox: Yes.
More: add Kameleo · add Multilogin · add GoLogin · full ranking