Head to head · checked 2026-10-13
Camoufox vs Octo Browser
Camoufox wins 4 of 8 criteria (local-first privacy, free tier, open source, price at scale). Octo Browser leads on profile management.
8Fingerprint engine · 22%8
10Local-first privacy · 18%4
10Free tier · 14%0
10Open source · 12%0
7Automation & API · 12%7
10Platforms · 10%10
1Profile management · 8%9
10Price at scale · 4%3
Camoufox wins 4 of 8 criteria, Octo Browser wins 1.
CamoufoxOcto Browser
Side by side
| Camoufox | Octo Browser | |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | Camoufox (Firefox) | Chromium (Chromium) |
| Free plan | Fully free. No profile manager. | None. 2-day trial. |
| Paid from | Free | €10/mo, 3 profiles |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | MPL-2.0 | No |
| Storage | Local | Cloud |
| Account | Not required | Required |
| Automation | Playwright (Python and Node) | API from Base (€79), Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright |
| Incidents | None found | None found |
Choose Camoufox if
Developers who script Playwright and need no GUI.
Choose Octo Browser if
Teams that pay for support and want cloud sync.
FAQ
Is Camoufox better than Octo Browser?
On our method, yes: 84.8 vs 51.6. Camoufox wins on local-first privacy, free tier, open source, price at scale; Octo Browser wins on profile management.
Which is cheaper, Camoufox or Octo Browser?
Camoufox: Fully free. No profile manager. Paid from Free. Octo Browser: None. 2-day trial. Paid from €10/mo.
Do Camoufox and Octo Browser support Linux?
Camoufox: Yes. Octo Browser: Yes.
More: add Donut Browser · add Kameleo · add Multilogin · full ranking