Head to head · checked 2026-10-13
Camoufox vs Kameleo
Camoufox wins 5 of 8 criteria (local-first privacy, free tier, open source, platforms, price at scale). Kameleo leads on fingerprint engine, automation & api, profile management.
Camoufox wins 5 of 8 criteria, Kameleo wins 3.
Side by side
| Camoufox | Kameleo | |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | Camoufox (Firefox) | Chroma (Chromium), Junglefox (Firefox) |
| Free plan | Fully free. No profile manager. | 2 concurrent browsers, unlimited local profiles, 100 cloud profiles. |
| Paid from | Free | €59/mo, 10 concurrent browsers, 5,000 cloud profiles |
| Linux | Yes | Partial |
| Open source | MPL-2.0 | No |
| Storage | Local | Local + cloud |
| Account | Not required | Required |
| Automation | Playwright (Python and Node) | Local API, SDKs, Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium |
| Incidents | None found | None found |
Choose Camoufox if
Developers who script Playwright and need no GUI.
Choose Kameleo if
Teams that run heavy automation and need two engines.
FAQ
Is Camoufox better than Kameleo?
On our method, yes: 84.8 vs 66.4. Camoufox wins on local-first privacy, free tier, open source, platforms, price at scale; Kameleo wins on fingerprint engine, automation & api, profile management.
Which is cheaper, Camoufox or Kameleo?
Camoufox: Fully free. No profile manager. Paid from Free. Kameleo: 2 concurrent browsers, unlimited local profiles, 100 cloud profiles. Paid from €59/mo.
Do Camoufox and Kameleo support Linux?
Camoufox: Yes. Kameleo: Partial.
More: add Donut Browser · add Multilogin · add GoLogin · full ranking